The creator-king-god Ptah and the living Apis bull which was his visible earthly manifestation enjoyed supreme religious and socio-political importance at Memphis, one of Egypt’s oldest political, economic, administrative, and sacral capitals. The large temple enclosure of Ptah once stood as the focal point within the central part of the settlement and dominated the landscape, everyday life, and the elite culture of Memphis for centuries.3 Social networks and power groups active in Memphis were mostly concentrated around the Ptah precinct. This is particularly well documented between the New Kingdom (c. 1,539-1,077 B.C.) and the end of the Ptolemaic period (30 B.C.), although never fully explored in modern scholarship.4
I argue here that the south-western corner of the temple enclosure was the area where successive Apis divine bulls spent their lifetimes in a sanctuary, venerated as a living herald, and later even the ba, of the god Ptah.5 As a rule there could only be one Apis bull at a time, born around the same time as the death of his predecessor and identified by a set of previously-defined bodily markings. According to a long-standing tradition the main cultic episodes in the life of Apis included birth, coronation/installation, death, and burial.6 Apis could appear anywhere in Egypt.7 Once found, the animal was taken, along with its mother, to the House of the Inundation of the Nile (Nilopolis of Diodorus Siculus), a sanctuary most probably located on the east bank of the Nile towards Old Cairo,8 where the newly-found Apis calf and his mother allegedly spent forty days before being transferred across the Nile on the night of the full moon to Memphis for the installation within the temple of Ptah.9 Upon its natural death, the bull was assimilated with the god-king of the underworld, Osiris, as Apis-Osiris and Osiris-Apis respectively, initially following the Ancient Egyptian tradition that every justified being is identified with Osiris after death, and it later grew to be the unique Memphite form of Osiris himself.10 Accordingly, when represented as a psychopomp deity, the scenes of the Apis bull carrying the mummy of the deceased on its back appear on the foot ends of cartonnage and coffins under Sheshonq I (c. 943-922 B.C.) and are attested regularly across Egypt up to the Roman era.11
Fig. 1. Painted limestone statue of the sacred Apis bull, Louvre N 390 (Photo Courtesy of Alain Guilleux).
During the Early Dynastic period, as well as the Old Kingdom era, the Apis bull was perhaps predominantly used as a processional animal, symbolizing the fertility of crops and fields and agricultural rejuvenation, and associated with the periodic celebrations of royal public festivals at Memphis, like the Sed-festival or the king’s coronation.12 The organized cult of the divine Apis bulls appears in surviving sources only from the mid-second millennium B.C. onwards, perhaps already in the early 18th Dynasty (c. 1539-1390 B.C.), when the aforementioned rituals were apparently incorporated into the temple-based performances. Although the Apis bulls were known from the 1st Dynasty onward,13 evidence that the bulls were individually buried extends almost continuously from the middle of Amenhotep III’s reign (c. 1390-1353 B.C.) until the second half of the second century A.D. and possibly somewhat later. The focus of the elaborate burial ceremonies was a carefully embalmed mummy of a bull, carried in a long funerary procession from the Ptah precinct in Memphis to North Saqqara, where it was placed originally in a coffin, replaced later by a large stone sarcophagus under Amasis (570-526 B.C.). These were placed within the separate underground vault of the Serapeum on every attested occasion until the very end of the Ptolemaic era at latest; although it is plausible that the Serapeum was abandoned as the burial place of the Apis bulls during the early years of the Roman era14 as the burials of the Roman bulls have not yet been discovered. While the last known Apis burial is from c. 170 A.D., the bull’s divine protection was still sought in private prayers in the early third century A.D. and the last bull was reportedly found in 362 A.D. on the personal order of the Emperor Julian the Apostate.15 The funerary aspect seems to have become the most prominent within the personal religious practice of the mixed Memphite population during the Third Intermediate and Late Periods (c. 943-332 B.C.) and extended even beyond the Nile Valley, especially during Hellenistic and Roman times, when the bull was considered a subordinate aspect of the joint cult of Osiris/Sarapis and his sister-wife Isis all over the Mediterranean world.16
The Place of Apis (tA s.t @p) is a Demotic term used for the building or more likely complex of buildings where the Apis bulls were kept, lived, died, and were prepared for burial. In the hieroglyphic text of the Memphis Decree (the Rosetta stone; 197 B.C.), the Place of Installation of the living Apis (Hwt-sxn n.t @p anx) is used as a synonym for the Place of Apis.17 Furthermore, the Place of Apis is mentioned several times in The Apis Embalming Ritual, a detailed manual describing the embalming process of the divine bull. This text is preserved on the late Ptolemaic papyrus P. Wien KHM ÄS 3873, written in Hieratic and Demotic (rt. I-VI; vs. I-III),18 and its recently-published first column P. Zagreb 597-2, written mainly in Hieratic with many passages in Demotic (rt. 0). The former is a Ptolemaic copy making references to events of 351/350 B.C.19 The sanctuary is referred to four times on P. Zagreb 597-2 (rt. 0, 11, 12, 17),20 and only once in P. Wien KHM ÄS 3873 (rt. IV 10),21 which can aid further identification of the precinct’s other parts. Nevertheless, its exact location and layout are yet to be identified on the site since large parts of the Ptah temple enclosure now lie hidden under the modern settlement of Mit Rahina. Despite the lack of hard evidence, the Place of Apis must have been the same as the one mentioned by Strabo: ‘the bull Apis is kept in a kind of sanctuary, being regarded, as I have said, as god’.22 Unfortunately, no living quarters for most of the numerous attested sacred animals across Egypt (for example, a ram of Mendes,23 or an ibis and a baboon of Hermopolis),24 has ever been identified archaeologically, but it is usually suggested that they resided within the corresponding temple proper. Indeed, the recent excavations at Elephantine by the German Archaeological Institute and the Swiss Institute (from autumn 2013 to spring 2014) discovered a building complex south of the Khnum temple composed of an isolated chamber (about 3.6 m wide and 4.3 m deep) and a courtyard (10 m wide and 15 m long) in front of it. In addition, ‘a short, slightly curved passage at the north-eastern corner of the court gave direct access to the side entrance of the temple of Khnum’.25 This area is therefore identified as a house of the sacred ram of Khnum, whose burial ground was found, on the opposite, northern side of the temple,26 in a relative position similar to that of the two excavated ram cemeteries at Mendes.27
Extra 1. Presumed map of the southwestern part of the precinct of Ptah, displayed over the actual satellite image of Mit Rahineh. Georeference: The Colossus of Ramses II at number 6 on plan is 29.849°N 31.254°E.
Fig. 2. Presumed map of the southwestern part of the precinct of Ptah, compiled from maps in Jeffreys (1985), Jones and Milward Jones (1988), p. 106, fig. 1 and Jurman (2010), p. 240, fig. 3.
1. The Place of Embalmment;
2. The stall;
3. The Pavilion of Appearances;
4. The gateway of Psammetichus I;
5. The southern courtyard;
6. The southern entrance gateway, the Colossus of Ramses II and the open-air museum;
7. The Sacred Way
Alan B. Lloyd argues that the sanctuary of Apis possibly stood outside the temenos walls of the Ptah precinct.28 This seems unlikely considering the close theological ties of the sacred bull and the god Ptah, and also keeping in mind the recent discovery described above at Elephantine. Indeed, a stela dated to the second year of Nectanebo II (Cairo JE 40002 l. 3-4; 358 B.C.) records the rebuilding of the Place of Apis ‘at the temple of his father Ptah’ (r Hwt-nTr n.t it=f PtH).29 Furthermore, in Ptolemaic times the two temples are even regarded as one.30 Thus, its location has to be inside the Ptah temple temenos walls, certainly within the southwestern sector of the temple enclosure where the Place of Embalmment (wab.t) has already been identified (see below).31 In the most recent reconstruction, Pierre Meyrat placed the bull’s living quarters to the south of the Place of Embalmment, towards the north face of the Ptah temple enclosure wall which had been rebuilt, probably on a line with the former Ramesside wall, by the Ptolemaic era at the latest.32 On the other hand, it seems unlikely that the living quarters of the Apis bulls stood in such a limited space, bearing in mind the location of the small chapel of Seti I (c. 1290-1279 B.C.) and Ramses II (c. 1279-1212 B.C.) directly across the wabet. These were still in use during the reigns of the Nubian kings Shabaka (c. 716-702 B.C.) and Taharqa (690-664 B.C.), and perhaps much later, since blocks bearing Shabaka’s and Taharqa’s names were found reused in the later construction.33 The Nubian kings also bestowed the precinct of Apis with rich gifts.34 Moreover, it is now certain that the Place of Embalmment formed only a part of the Place of Apis itself. On the west side of the alabaster basin of the lion libation bed no. 4, found at the easternmost end of Room A, a short hieroglyphic inscription reads ‘the wabet [of] the temple of Apis’ (wab.t [n.t] Hwt-nTr n.t @p).35 The remains on the site strongly indicate a building phase from the reign of Ramses II to Darius I and reconstruction works undertaken by the 25th and the 26th Dynasty rulers; however, the sanctuary was then completely rebuilt under Nectanebo II.36
The Place of Embalmment (wab.t) is the only part of the sanctuary still visible within the south-western corner of the Ptah temples enclosure at Memphis. It is located on the north side of the main road from Bedrashein to Saqqara. The interior of the building consists of four long, narrow, parallel transverse rooms (A, B, C, D), connected by a passage starting at the extreme east end of the building.37 South of Room D, called the South Area (today badly ruined),38 are several preserved architectural features which indicate that this sector might have been the location of the central hall of the Place of Embalmment (wsx.t aA.t tA wab.t), mentioned in both P. Wien KHM ÄS 3873 (rt. IV, 20),39 and the donation stela of Nectanebo II.40 Two groups of massive limestone blocks appear to have been foundations of doorways lying on an east-west axis,41 leading to the rest of the sanctuary situated to the east (see below), and the remains of a colonnade comprising four columns in a line, found by Petrie,42 perhaps represented ‘the fir-tree ceiling’ (pA kp aS), i.e. the southern entrance of the Place of Embalmment.43 The monolithic calcite Table 4 (1.20m x 3.07m x 5.40m) is the finest and least damaged among several others found within the building either whole, below the pavement of Room A (Table 3),44 or split into four (Table 1),45 or into two pieces (Table 2); Table 2 is dedicated by King Amasis (570-526 B.C.).46 It lies at the east end of Room A and was very likely used during the embalming ritual; its spouts and drainage channels were designed to carry off either bodily fluids or libations.47 Table 4 apparently belongs to a later building phase,48 and is possibly contemporary with a large mudbrick platform built of casemate walls with a loose fill between them to the north of the Place of Embalmment.49 A hoard of silver coins, found within loose mudbrick debris of the platform, indicate that it was constructed around the mid-fourth century B.C.,50 which coincides with the rebuilding of the sanctuary by Nectanebo II.51
In a passage of P. Wien KHM ÄS 3873, while describing the construction of a temporary tent outside the southern door of the Place of Embalmment, the scribe also mentions that this tent ‘is open [to] the stall (pA ihj) [and] the south wall of the Place of Apis (tA DAi.t rsy(.t) tA s.t !p)’ (rt. IV 10).52 Therefore, it is possible that the stall formed a part of the Place of Apis in addition to the Place of Embalmment. According to the passage, the stall had east and west doors (rt. IV 10-12): ‘They [the priests] open the door which is in the east wall of the stall; they come out from it after they found him [Apis] in the 23th Year of Pharaoh Amasis (548 B.C.), may he live, be prosperous and healthy, whereas it is from the door which is built in the west wall of the stall that they came out in the 12th Year of Pharaoh Apries (578 B.C.), may he live, be prosperous and healthy’.53 The west door was apparently opened when a bull died (the official royal stela Louvre, IM 132, confirms the burial in 578 B.C.),54 and the east door was most probably used when a new bull was found or more likely enthroned,55 and very likely stood on the same axis. The general direction of the burial ritual itself must, therefore, have been formulated primarily due to practical reasons, in order to fit within the physical arrangement of the existing buildings. Since the deceased bull was rapidly removed from the stall to the central hall of the Place of Embalmment (rt. IV, 20: wsx.t aA.t tA wab.t),56 those two places most certainly shared the same wall and must have been part of the same building complex. Mourning lamentations were made throughout the central hall of the Place of Apis (rt. 0, 12: wsx.t aA.t tA s.t @p),57 when a bull had died, before the embalming process began. As the lamentations are mentioned following the removal of the bull’s corpse through the door in the west wall of the stall, these two rooms certainly could not be the same.58 Furthermore, foundations of a doorway, found in the eastern wall of the Place of Embalmment,59 perhaps served this purpose, strongly indicating that the rest of the sanctuary of Apis was located further to the east.
Fig. 3. Alabaster embalming table 4, looking south-east, at the Place of Embalmment (photo courtesy of Alain Guilleux).
Fig. 4. Detail of the alabaster embalming table 4, looking north-west, at the Place of Embalmment (photo courtesy of Alain Guilleux).
The general direction of burial processions corroborates such a possibility. When the mummy of a bull was ready it was brought out of the Place of Embalmment to the stall, where the naos of the sacred barge was waiting. Then the bull’s mummy was placed on a wheeled wagon. At the same time, the doorway in the east wall of the stall was opened for the funerary wagon to pass through, most probably in the direction of the southern pylon tower of the Ptah temple enclosure which once stood some 160 m southeast of the Place of Embalmment, behind the now fallen colossus of Ramses II. This moment is perhaps recorded on a stela of Nectanebo II (Cairo JE 40002 l. 18): ‘After his divinity [the dead bull] came opposite the great double-door, he [Apis] found his Majesty [king] standing among his [the bull’s] followers…’ (jr m-xtj jnTr=f m-aqA rw.tj-wr.tj gm.n=f Hm=f aHa(w) m Smsw=f).60 Just beyond the southern gateway ran the sacred way to the south, which remained in use until Ptolemaic times.61 The area along the southeastern line of the enclosure wall was an important sacred space in the Late Period and most probably contained the smaller superstructures, perhaps chapels. A fragment of the statue of Udjahorresnet, an important state official who lived between the reigns of Amasis and Darius I, was found reused in a brick building possibly in the late Ptolemaic/early Roman times, but it is plausible that it once stood in one of the smaller sanctuaries subsidiaries to the enclosure of Ptah.62
The wheeled funerary wagon left the Place of Embalmment via the west door of the stall (that is, the east door of the Place of Embalmment), and passed through the east door towards the southern pylon. A vague passage in P. Wien KMH ÄS 3873 indicates that one of these doors was known as the Portal of the Horizon (rt. IV, 20: sbx.t Ax.t), closely associated with the great hall of the Place of Embalmment.63 Vos argues that this door has to be located at the place where the sun arises to symbolize the god’s cosmic resurrection.64 Thus, the Portal of the Horizon cannot be placed at the southern entrance of the Place of Embalmment as previously believed. Also, the presence of the priests of the House of the Inundation of the Nile (Pr-@apj) beyond this door, who apparently threw the brick (tb.t) in front of the wagon to prevent it from advancing,65 further indicates the possibility that this door was the same as the west door of the stall/east door of the Place of Embalmment. Another possibility is that the Portal of the Horizon is the very entrance of the stall. Their care for a newly-found sacred bull justifies their participation in resurrection ceremonies of a deceased bull. Beside the eastern door of the stall apparently stood the Pavilion of Appearances (rt. IV, 14-15), where the wheeled funerary wagon was drawn in by the wab priests on its way out of the sanctuary, while gathered mourners raised a great lamentation.66
Another notable architectural feature of the Place of Apis should be mentioned here: an outer courtyard with a colonnade. When Herodotus (c. 484 - c. 424 B.C.) visited the precinct of Apis in the fifth century B.C., he said that Psammetichus I built a southern gateway to the temple of Ptah and a courtyard for Apis in front of it, surrounded by a colonnade, which rested upon colossal statues, twelve cubits (c. 5.30 m) in height, instead of columns.67 At the beginning of the Roman era, Strabo (c. 64B.C. – after 21A.D) positioned a courtyard in front of the sanctuary of Apis, together with a sanctuary for its mother cow.68 Since there is no precisely dated surviving evidence of Psammetichus I’s building activities within the city,69 very likely due to circumstances of preservation of known monuments there, it is usually considered that this gateway was set in the south temenos wall which once stood behind the fallen colossus of Ramses II.70 This would be the same gateway probably mentioned on a stela of Nectanebo II as an exit point for the burial procession. However, it is possible that Psammetichus I’s gateway was located further to the north, forming the southern entrance of the main temple complex of Ptah instead of the enclosure. If so, it is logical that the sanctuary of Apis could have been attached to the presumed southern courtyard between two pylons of the temple complex. The existence of such a courtyard is supported by the discovery of several private statues dated to the reign of Psammetichus I and later times in the area of the colossus of Ramses II,71 which indicate that this area was indeed publicly accessible, at least as a depository for private dedications of the Memphite elite. Its position is also suitable as a location where ordinary Egyptians and non-Egyptian visitors like Herodotus or later Strabo would have entered the Ptah temple precinct to see the Apis bull within his courtyard. This would only have happened on certain days since the daily cultic performances within the temple temenos walls were of a restricted nature and usually not accessible to the wider populace.72
Fig. 3. Limestone relief most likely from the sanctuary of Apis at Memphis, present-day location unknown © Griffith Institute, University of Oxford.
The question of column types can be helpful as well. Since Herodotus described columns like caryatids, Lloyd argues that his description could only refer to Osirian pillars,73 but no traces of such pillars were ever found within the temple of Ptah. One possible reason no Osirian pillars have been found is that they may have been made of wood, but another is that they may have been a different type of column.74 In the area to the east of the Place of Embalmment towards the colossus of Ramses II a column with a Hathor capital was found, but unfortunately without clear archeological context and certainly not in situ.75 There is evidence that a small Ramesside Hathor temple, apparently disused after the end of the New Kingdom and located south-west of the southern gateway of the Ptah temple enclosure, had been quarried for building material in the Late Period: at some point its eastern pylon and eastern courtyard had been removed and later replaced by a brick building (perhaps a workshop of some kind).76 Material from this site could have been reused in building a courtyard for the Apis bull. The association with the goddess Hathor came probably through the Mother of Apis cows, which were mentioned by their distinctive names for the first known time in the inscriptions under Amasis.77 Initially, the Mothers of Apis cows lived, died and were buried within the precinct of Hathor, the Lady of the Sycomore (Pr-nb.t-nhy.t), which was most probably located somewhere south of Memphis,78 before their stall and sanctuary were moved to a courtyard in front of the sanctuary of their offspring, and their burial place to North Saqqara at the remote vicinity of the Serapeum. This change certainly occurred in the later part of the First Persian Period.79 The close theological connection of the Mother of Apis cows with Hathor had been replaced by the 29th Dynasty (399-381 B.C.), when Isis appears in surviving inscriptions as the Mother of Apis and has remained so ever since.80
Identification of a courtyard in front of the sanctuary of Apis with the Pavilion of Appearance of the papyri is indeed possible. According to Quack, the usage of the word Sst indicates the place where the sacred animals had spent their lifetimes and died.81 Also, according to the Book of the Temple, a manual for the architecture of the ideal Egyptian temple and the duties of its priests and other employees, the sacred animal was happy if it could see the sun.82 Thus, the Pavilion of Appearances has to be an edifice open to the sky. In the case of the Apis bull, the Pavilion of Appearance was located beyond the entrance to the sanctuary of Apis as was stated in P. Wien KHM ÄS 3783. In addition, important news like the death of the Apis bulls was announced outdoors to gathered people. Strabo also mentioned the window on the sanctuary. Through this window the bull could be seen.83 Strabo adds that visitors prefer to see the Apis bull outside thus indicating the distance between their standpoint and the sanctuary itself. Since the word Sst is a late writing of sSd ‘window, the window of appearances’,84 it seems plausible that Strabo’s window represents an opening on the sanctuary and it is reasonable to conclude that this window overlooked a courtyard in front of it.
The Place of Apis or the Place of Installation of the living Apis was located inside the walls of the temple enclosure of Ptah at Memphis. The sanctuary was apparently composed of three architectural features: (1) the Pavilion of Appearances or an open courtyard with a colonnade, described by Herodotus and later Strabo, where initiated Egyptians and non-Egyptian visitors could see the Apis bull; (2) the stall, where the Apis bulls spent their lifetimes and died; and (3) the Place of Embalmment, where the dead bulls were wrapped into linen and prepared for the funerary procession. The sanctuary was built along an east-west axis, the Pavilion of Appearances being its eastern-most, and the Place of Embalmment its western-most end. Between these two features lay the stall, where the Apis bulls spent their lifetimes venerated as living heralds of the god Ptah. Finally, the Pavilion of Appearances was attached to the presumed southern open courtyard which very likely lay between two pylon-gates of the Ptah temple enclosure, therefore making the sanctuary of Apis publicly accessible.
Aly, M. I. (2006), ‘Documents inédits provenant des petits souterrains du Sérapéum de Memphis’, MDAIK 62, pp. 43-61.
Anthes, R. (1965), ‘General report on the excavation’, in R. Anthes (ed.), Mit Rahineh 1956, Philadelphia: University Museum, pp. 1-44.
Arnold F. et al. (2014), ‘Report on the Excavations at Elephantine by the German Archaeological Institute and the Swiss Institute from autumn 2013 to spring 2014’, link (18/10/2016).
Bareš, L. (1999), Abusir IV: The Shaft Tomb of Udjahorresnet at Abusir, Prague: The Charles University Press.
Bresciani, E. (1983), ‘Note di Toponomastica: I Templi di Mn-Nfr, Wn-#m, Pr-@apj-mHt’, EVO 6, pp. 67-73.
Burton, A. (1972), Diodorus Siculus, Book I. A Commentary, Leiden: Brill.
Chassinat, É. G. (1900), ‘Textes provenant du Sérapéum de Memphis’, RT 22, pp. 9-26, pp. 163-180.
Davies, S. (1998), ‘Uncharted Saqqara: A Postscript’, JEA 84, pp. 45-56.
Davies, S. (2006), The sacred animal necropolis at North Saqqara: The mother of Apis and baboon catacombs. The archaeological report, London: The Egypt Exploration Society.
Delange, E. and H. Jaritz (2013), Elephantine XXV: der Widderfriedhof des Chnumtempels, Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
Devauchelle, D. (1994), ‘Notes et documents pour servir à l'histoire du Sérapéum de Memphis (I-V)’, RdÉ 45, pp. 75-86.
Devauchelle, D. (1998), ‘Une invocation aux dieux du Sérapéum de Memphis’, in W. Clarysse, A. Schoors and H. Willems (eds.), Egyptian Religion. The Last Thousand Years. Studies dedicated to the memory of Jan Quaegebeur, Leven: Peeters, pp. 589-611.
Devauchelle, D. (2010), ‘Osiris, Apis, Sarapis et les autres. Remarques sur les Osiris memphites au Ier millénaire av. J.-C.’, in L. Coulon (ed.), Le culte d’Osiris au Ier millénaire av. J.-C. Découvertes et travaux récents, Cairo: IFAO, pp. 49-62.
Devauchelle, D. (2011), ‘La XXVIe dynastie au Sérapéum de Memphis’, in D. Devauchelle (ed.), La XXVIe dynastie: continuités et ruptures, Paris: Editions Cybele, pp. 139-152.
Devauchelle, D. (2012), ‘Pas d’Apis pour Sarapis’, in A. Gasse, F. Servajean and Chr. Thiers (eds), Et in Ægypto et ad Æegyptum. Recueil d’études dédiées à Jean-Claude Grenier, Montpellier: Université Paul Valéry-Montpellier III, pp. 213-225.
Dodson, A. (2005), ‘Bull Cults’, in S. Ikram (ed.), Divine Creatures. Animal Mummies in Ancient Egypt, Cairo: American University in Cairo Press, pp. 72-105.
Donahue, V. A. (1978), ‘Pr-nfr’, JEA 64, pp. 143-148.
Erichsen, W. (1954), Demotisches Glossar, Copenhagen: EinarMunksgaard.
Farid, A. (1997), ‘Zwanzig demotische Apisinschriften’, MDAIK 53, pp. 23-56.
Gorre, G. (2009), Les relations du clergé Égyptien et des lagides d'après les sources privées, Leuven: Peeters.
Habachi, L. (1979), ‘New Light on Objects of Unknown Provenance. III: A Head of Queen Touy and a Block of Shabaka Now Kept in Museum Abroad’, GM 31, pp. 47-53.
Hermann, A. (1960), ‘Der letzte Apisstier’, Jahrbuch für Antike und Christentum 3, pp. 34-50.
Hoogendijk F.A.J. (2012), ‘Maternal Division of Housed Property near the Temples of Memphis’, in Cuvigny H., Hickey T. M., Ast R., Lougovaya J. (eds.), Papyrological Texts in Honor of Roger S. Bagnall, Durham, NC: The American Society of Papyrologists, pp. 149-158.
Jeffreys, D. (1985), The Survey of Memphis I. The Archaeological Report, London: The Egypt Exploration Society.
Jones, M. (1990), ‘The Temple of Apis in Memphis’, JEA 76, pp. 141-147.
Jones, M. and Milward Jones, A. (1982), ‘The Apis House Project at Mit Rahinah: first season, 1982’, JARCE 19, pp. 51-58.
Jones, M. and Milward Jones, A. (1983), ‘The Apis House Project at Mit Rahinah Preliminary Report of the second and third Seasons, 1982-1983’, JARCE 20, pp. 33-45.
Jones, M. and Milward Jones, A. (1985), ‘Apis expedition at Mit Rahinah: preliminary report of the fourth season, 1984’, JARCE 22, pp. 17-28.
Jones, M. and Milward Jones, A. (1987), ‘The Apis House Project at Mit Rahinah: preliminary report of the fifth season, 1984-1985’, JARCE 24, pp. 35-46.
Jones, M. and Milward Jones, A. (1988), ‘The Apis House Project at Mit Rahinah: preliminary report of the sixth season, 1986’, JARCE 25, pp. 105-116.
Jurman, C. (2010), ‘Running with Apis. Memphite Animal Cults as a Point of Reference for Social and Religious Practices in Late Period Elite Culture’, in L. Bareš, F. Coppens, K. Smoláriková (eds.), Egypt in transition. Social and Religious Development of Egypt in the First Millennium B.C.. Proceedings of a Conference Held at Prague, 1st-4th September 2009, Prague: Charles University Press, pp. 224-267.
Kessler, D. (1989), Die heiligen Tiere und der König. Teil I: Beiträge zu Organisation, Kult und Theologie der spätzeitlichen Tierfriedhöfe, Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
Kessler, D. and A. Nur el-Din (2005), ‘Tuna al-Gebel: millions of ibises and other animals’, in S. Ikram (ed.), Divine creatures: animal mummies in ancient Egypt, Cairo; New York: American University in Cairo Press, pp. 120-163.
Krauss, R. (2007), ‘Die Mahler-Borchardtsche These über die Apis-Inthronisationen bei Vollmond’, Acta Praehistorica et Archaeologica 39, pp. 339-348.
Leblanc, Ch. (1980), ‘Piliers et colosses de type “osiriaque” dans le contexte des temples de culte royale’, BIFAO 80, pp. 69-89.
Leclant, J. (1951), ‘Compte rendu des fouilles et travaux menés en Égypte durant les campagnes, 1948-50. III.’, Orientalia 20, pp. 343-351.
Leclant, J. (1981), ‘Varia Aethiopica’, MDAIK 37, pp. 289-297, Taf. 44.
Leclère, F. (2008), Les villes de Basse Égypte au Ier millénaire av. J.-C. Analyse archéologique et historique de la topographie urbaine, Cairo: IFAO.
Lloyd, A. B. (1988), Herodotus Book II. Commentary 99-182, Leiden: Brill.
Málek, J. (1986), ‘The Monument Recorded by Alice Lieder in the “Temple of Vulcan” at Memphis in May 1853’, JEA 72, pp. 101-112.
Meyrat, P. (2014a), ‘Topography-related Problems in the Apis Embalming Ritual’, in J. F. Quack (ed.), Ägyptische Rituale der griechisch-römischen Zeit, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, pp. 247-262 and plate available here.
Meyrat, P. (2014b), ‘The First Column of the Apis Embalming Ritual Papyrus Zagreb 597-2’, in J. F. Quack (ed.), Ägyptische Rituale der griechisch-römischen Zeit, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, pp. 263-337, and transcription available here.
Otto, E. (1938), Beiträge zur Geschichte der Stierkulte in Ägypten, Leipzig: Hinrichs.
Panov, M. V. (2015), Источники по истории жреческих семей Мемфиса и Летополя в поздний период, Novosibirsk: M. V. Panov.
Pope, J. (2014), The Double Kingdom under Taharqo. Studies in the History of Kush and Egypt, c. 690-664 BC, Leiden/Boston: Brill.
Quack, J. F. (1994), ‘Reznesion: The Apis Embalming Ritual’, Enchoria 21, pp. 186-191.
Quack, J. F. (1995), ‘Zwei Handbücher der Mumifizierung im Balsamierungsritual des Apisstieres’, Enchoria 22, pp. 123-129.
Quack, J. F. (1997/1998), ‘Beiträge zum Verständnis des Apisrituals’, Enchoria 24, pp. 43-53.
Quack, J. F. (2000), ‘Das Buch vom Tempel und verwandte Texte: ein Vorbericht’, ARG 2, pp. 1-20.
Quack, J. F. (2003a), ‘Die Rolle des heiligen Tieres im Buch vom Tempel’, in M. Fitzenreiter (ed.), Tierkulte im pharaonischen Ägypten und im Kulturvergleich, Berlin: Wilhelm Fink Verlag, pp. 111-123.
Quack, J. F. (2003b), ‘Le Manuel du Temple, une nouvelle source sur la vie des prêtres égyptiens’, EAO 29, pp. 11-18.
Quack, J. F. (2004), ‘Organiser le culte idéal. Le Manuel du Temple’, BSFE 160, pp. 11-25.
Quibell, J. E. (1909), Excavations at Saqqara (1907-8), Cairo: IFAO.
Quirke, S. and Andrews, C. A. R. (1988), The Rosetta Stone: facsimile drawing, London: The British Museum Press.
Redford, S. and D. B. Redford (2005), ‘The cult and necropolis of the sacred ram at Mendes’, in S. Ikram (ed.), Divine creatures: animal mummies in ancient Egypt, Cairo; New York: American University in Cairo Press, pp. 164-198.
Simpson, W. K. (1957), ‘A running of the Apis in the reign of 'Aḥa and passages in Manetho and Aelian’, Orientalia 26, pp. 139-142.
Smith, H. S. (1988), 'A Memphite miscellany', in J. Baines, T. G. H. James, A. Leahy, and A. F. Shore (eds.), Pyramid studies and other essays presented to I. E. S. Edwards, London: Egypt Exploration Society, pp. 184-192.
Smith, H. S., Andrews, C. A. R. and Davies, S. (2011), The Sacred Animal Necropolis at North Saqqara: The Mother of Apis Inscriptions, London: The Egypt Exploration Society.
Spalinger, A. (1998), ‘The Limitation of Formal Ancient Egyptian Religion’, JNES 57/4, pp. 241-260.
Spencer, P. (1984), The Egyptian Temple. A Lexicographical Study, London: Kegan Paul International.
Thompson, D. J. (2012), Memphis under the Ptolemies, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Vercoutter, J. (1960), ‘The Napatan Kings and Apis Worship (Serapeum Burials of the Napatan Period)’, Kush 8, pp. 62-76.
Vittmann, G. (2003), Ägypten und die Fremden im ersten vorchristichen Jahrtausand, Mainz: Verlag Philipp von Zabern.
Vos, R. L. (1993), The Apis Embalming Ritual. P. Vindob. 3873, Leuven: Peeters, 1993.
Wilkinson, T. A. H. (1999), Early Dynastic Egypt, London/New York: Routledge.